Thursday, September 21, 2017

Pinching Pennies and Squeezing Your Eyes and Ears Shut

See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil...Because, yes indeed, from the perspective of the Port Angeles City Council, it's better to be deaf, dumb and blind as you go about the business of "leading" the town.



 
Case in point: The City Council are congratulating themselves (in a 6-0 fashion, with Doughy Dan Gase M.I.A.) and praising staff for "pinching pennies" to get through the honest to goodness budget crisis caused by the (former) Nippon mill being ("temporarily") shut down.

In response to the sale and retooling of the former Nippon paper mill, City officials are pinching pennies to balance the books in 2018. The Port Angeles City Council voted 6-0 Tuesday to approve a budget amendment that reflects $373,500 in one-time savings that staff identified to offset the loss of utility tax revenue from the City's largest power customer.

"If it were not for the wonderful work of our staff," said doddering Mayor Downie, "we'd be in a big hole."

Where to begin?

First, this is, as usual, the City lurching from one crisis to another, with no thought to the underlying issues. It's a band-aid approach to budgeting. Even when Nippon was operational, the utility taxes were never a sure thing, because they would lower or halt production at times, severely crimping the City's tax income. I remember Max Mania advocating for crafting a budget that simply didn't include or depend on Nippon's tax revenue, as a way to truly go lean, and to be able to ride out the fluctuations in tax revenue better. That way, any Nippon utility income would have been a happy bonus.

But, of course, the City will never, ever admit that the mill might not be fully functional, or, god forbid, might even close for good. So they keep on leaning on it financially, even though it's about as dependable as a rubber crutch. I'm sure City staff would say that a rubber crutch is better than no crutch at all. In any case, they keep tripping themselves up.

And do notice how staff is always - and I do mean always - able to identify hundreds of thousands of dollars in savings when these predictable crises occur. Now, you'd think and hope that they would always be alert to keeping costs down, and thus lessening the financial burden on their tax and rate payers. But no, they always - and I do mean always - have plenty of fat built into the system.


In other words, City staff game the system, then manipulate and lead their so-called leaders on the City Council to the - gosh! - very conclusion they want. Then said City Council, having convinced themselves of their intelligent management, close the circle of jerks by praising staff for their "wonderful work."

It's pathetic.

But do you think they really think about the potential consequences of this:

City Manager Dan McKeen, who was also absent from Tuesday's meeting, said retooling of the mill will cost the City about $315,5000 in revenue this year, and another $440,000 in 2018. When operational, the mill consumes nearly half of the electricity used in the entire city, providing tax revenue for services such as public safety, parks and streets.

The City's whole position is "things will be fine once the mill comes back." But what if? What if it simply never opens again? What if it opens at a significantly reduced level? What if they decide to use their cogen facilities to power themselves? What if any or all of that causes both the budget for essential services to be drastically cut, while simultaneously raising rates for the City's other utility customers?

There are so many ways this could go wrong. The signs (literally!) are already there that McKinley isn't exactly deeply committed to Port Angeles. Budgeting based on hopes and past glories is a surefire recipe for disaster. But the idiotic members of the Port Angeles City Council refuse to even consider anything other than a staff-induced fantasy. So they'll just keep pretending to "pinch pennies" while at the same time squeezing their eyes and ears shut tight, lest any reality try to force its way into their cold, closed minds.

22 comments:

  1. What is with the PDN fawning over Cherie Kidd? Everyone listed in the article is listed with their title, i.e. Mayor Patrick Downie, City Manager Dan McKeen, Councilman Dan Gase....but when they get to Cherie Kidd they have to drag it out as "Deputy Mayor Cherie Kidd, a third-term council member and former mayor"? Why is this relevant? Why are they singling her out?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, again, CK. You point out the root problems that keep this town the backwards millbilly town that it is.

    Mills don't close. Rayonier didn't close. It just morphed into a different kind of industry, and continues to employ people to this day.

    The assumptions in the City's positions. That in it's new "re-tooled" form, the mill will use the same amount of utilities it did before, therefore the City can plan on receiving the same amount of revenue. Nothing will change. Change doesn't happen.

    Right? Change doesn't happen in Port Angeles. And they plan accordingly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Still no online utility bill payment options available, it's been over a month. How's that investigation into the hack coming along? Maybe you should fix the link to the online bill payment site so that it doesn't show a big scary security warning about a security certificate, and then it links to a 404 page not found error. Put up a simple page explaining it's unavailable, it will be back eventually, and here are your options to pay your bill. This isn't rocket science, unless you're incompetent.

    Transportation benefit district sales tax passed with almost no attention given to it by the public. It's easy to pass taxes to rebuild infrastructure when you ignore it for years and let it crumble. Then put it on the ballot during the summer with hardly anything else so most people won't bother to vote. Also, the statement by City Manager Dan McKeen that it wouldn't actually be enough funding for what is needed has been completely forgotten. You can bet they'll be doing to maximum increases allowed without a vote on that one every time.

    City council supports the county's latest sales tax for juvenile justice. You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours.

    County bans (currently non-existent) retail cannabis sales in Joyce, while ignoring easy access to alcohol and tobacco. And completely ignoring the actual reason people filled out that community survey about drugs: meth and heroin.

    And oh no! FENTANYL-LACED WEED!!! We're all going to die! It's certainly not likely that a field test was bungled or that the dealer handling the weed was also handling fentanyl. We should definitely not wait for a proper lab test to confirm it, and instead go straight to the newspaper to incite fear (and make our law enforcement look like idiots, although the Sheriff does that himself regularly). There are no confirmed cases of laced weed. It doesn't even make sense to do, people are just trying to scare you.

    Unhappy about all this stuff? You have only one option: vote with your money by leaving Port Angeles. Don't give them any money for utility bills, property taxes, sales taxes or anything else ever again. GET OUT!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The city council is so used to Nippon calling the shots, they're still bowing down to an empty building. This ingrained genuflecting is creepy and bizarre. Let McKinley actually open, actually hire locals, and actually invest in the community. Then and only then will we know their intentions, and possibly, just possibly, be able to make forecasts about their tax revenue to the city.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As CK points out here, don't miss what the city is doing.

    They are acting as though they are brave, when they are merely responding to a crisis.

    And they are still of the mindset that this is a "temporary" crisis. They are thinking, and will doubtlessly be budgeting, as though it is a sure thing that these tax funds will be coming back.

    There is no guarantee of that. Zero. Many factors, as pointed out, could change.

    The only thing that doesn't change is the inability of people like Cherie, Pat and Brad to see the obvious. Future council members like Jim Moran and Jake O'Hole seem likely to share this blind spot.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yet another signature thread about Port Angeles. Bet they're going around saying "Who could have seen this coming?"

    What I'd like to know is, where are the city layoffs? Or is that their sacred cow?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Look! There is a train coming. Get off the tracks!

    No, trains never come down these tracks. We can continue dozing away. There's no problem. Don't disturb my sleep.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why is Port Angeles so competent at detailed planning of financial crimes and scams, yet so incompetent at basic municipal management?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because basic municipal management costs money - money the crooks could be pocketing instead. Priorities, don't ya know?

      Delete
  9. Cut the Port pork and stop all payments to EDC. Problem solved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If only it were that simple.

      Not that the EDC is not a problem. But, it is just the end product OF the problem that is Port Angeles. The EDC is just one of the many tools the scamsters use to fleece the taxpayers and public systems of money.

      As another poster noted above, these "problems", like a mill threatening to close, or the drug overdose statistics are just used by the scamsters as rationales to appeal to those in control of the purse strings. The projects, like the EDC, or HarborWorks, or the "CSO Fix" have nothing to do with actually addressing the problems. They are just the "crisis du jour" that the general public will feel some empathy about, and not question any specifics, so that the tax money can be funneled to the right people.

      As the other person said, it is an industry.

      Delete
  10. IF McKinley ever does go into operation, it will be interesting to see the extent the City goes to help them feel right at home. You know, like they did with Nippon, Pen Ply, and Grant Munro's Logs-for-China.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and, with this big NEED for $$$, the city will continue to whore themselves out and not ask for any air scrubbers, and/or other odor control measures, to keep the stench down.

      We'll be the old joke: she said, "kiss me where it smells". He drove her to Port Angles.

      Who likes the smell of rotten cabbage?

      Kraft paper anything and hello Mercaptans!

      Welcome to Toxic Air Port Angeles (TA-PA).

      Delete
    2. The smell of rotten cabbage will fit right in with the oil tankers in the harbor, and log yards on the waterfront.

      How to keep property values low.

      Delete
  11. This can only be called a "band-aid" approach to city finances. We need a systemic approach beginning at the granular level. For instance, why does a town this size need an assistant chief of police? Remove this position from the city structure and bang, you have recouped nearly one third of the short fall in one fell swoop. This will not be noticed by anyone but the assistant chief as he looks for another job. Further down that track why not dissolve the entire $6,000,000 per year police department and contract with the sheriff's department for half that amount. All the patrol personnel could be taken up into the sheriff's department and the command personnel can retire or apply for sheriff's department posts. Why do we need so many engineers on city staff when we outsource all the work in that area already. Why are we paying $200,000 for a city attorney who then outsources all that activity to outside attorneys. Bloor hasn't done anything of value for the city in years, why is he still around? Why do we need a "Director" of parks and recreation? Another $100,000 position. Couldn't this be handled out of another department such as public works? Or couldn't this be handled with a $50,000 person working out of the city manager's office? Why do we need a hundred thousand dollar Human Resources person when there are scads of HR consulting companies who could handle these chores for one fourth the present costs? Going back a ways why did the city donate one million dollars to the Harbor Works project? There is no sane person who believed it was a viable investment. Why did the city purchase the toxic waste dump, the Nichel property, for one million dollars with no plans for it and no intention of cleaning it up? Why does the city set off its ambulance duties to a private ambulance company when the city could be collecting for each and every ambulance call. This alone would make up the downfall from the mills closure. Why are the tipping fees at the city dump the highest in the state and possibly in the nation? Why did we have to "fix" the dump failure two or three times? With all the engineers on staff couldn't we expect to get it right the first time? These are questions an engaged city council would ask but instead they preen and posture and pretend to be looking out for the taxpayers. Why do we neglect road and street repairs until they are so dire as to be in emergency status? Taxpayers are getting screwed in so many ways it boggles the mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well stated!

      But, the starting assumption is that there is a desire to do it "right", in the first place, as opposed to the actual situation, where it is really all about using the system, taxpayer funded, to get as much money as you can. For as long as you can.

      Delete
    2. Because Port Angeles is a desperate socialist town, severely bloating the city payroll in an attempt to have some semblance of an economy. Because why market yourselves to lots of great businesses and entrepreneurs, when the good ole boys care only to pilfer for themselves under cover of their bloated government?

      All this won't end until some actual intelligence infiltrates the area in numbers. Because anyone with a brain can see what a waste ofpotential it is, having a few hillbilly thugs taking the whole pie for themselves.

      Delete
    3. But Port Angeles isn't desperate. They don't have to care.

      If you add up all the various public and government jobs in Port Angeles, they make the majority. If you look at the higher wages being paid, with bennies, they are all public and government.

      They can't be fired, get paid well, and have very little actual accountability.

      You think that is going to change any time soon?

      Delete
  12. Front page story in Sunday 9/24/17 Seattle Times illustrates another very sad situation with roots in Port Angeles:
    http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/times-watchdog/everyone-failed-him-boys-aunt-accused-of-murder-dshs-accused-of-critical-errors/
    A five year old child's death, and those who failed him and his siblings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes well, lets face it, this is a town that doesn't believe in following rules, or proper procedures.

      Delete
  13. Boy, I sure hope that the city stays solvent until our city manager can retire and get his six figure retirement benefits (from the fire dept AND the city manager job).

    ReplyDelete
  14. Too bad Chapter 9 is only voluntary.

    ReplyDelete